Tuesday, April 5, 2011

Yahoo! News: World News English


Jaycee Dugard's accused kidnapper set for plea: lawyer (Reuters)

Posted: 04 Apr 2011 05:56 PM PDT

LOS ANGELES (Reuters) – The California man accused of abducting 11-year-old Jaycee Dugard in 1991 and holding her captive for 18 years will plead guilty this week, a lawyer for his wife and co-defendant said on Monday.

Phillip Garrido, 59, has agreed to plead guilty under a deal with prosecutors that will avoid a trial but likely send him to prison for life, attorney Steve Tapson, who represents Nancy Garrido, told Reuters in a telephone interview.

"He wants to not put Jaycee through a trial and he wants to help Nancy and he's already confessed to it anyway," Tapson said.

Tapson said Nancy Garrido, 55, was still set to stand trial despite his efforts to negotiate a plea deal that would spare her a life prison term.

Prosecutors declined to comment on the case and a public defender appointed to represent Phillip Garrido was in court on Monday afternoon and could not be reached.

The Garridos are charged with snatching Dugard, then 11, from a street near her South Lake Tahoe home on June 10, 1991 and holding her captive in a squalid compound behind their home near Antioch for nearly two decades.

Authorities say Phillip Garrido fathered two girls with Dugard and kept them concealed until the convicted rapist aroused the suspicion of police while proselytizing at a college campus.

Dugard's rescue at the age of 29 made international headlines.

Tapson said both Garridos had given "full confessions" to El Dorado County authorities.

He said Nancy Garrido should be shown some mercy by the court because she has no prior criminal record and was under her husband's sway at the time of the abduction.

The couple met at the federal prison in Leavenworth, where Phillip Garrido was serving time for rape and Nancy was visiting another prisoner.

(Reporting by Dan Whitcomb)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

Supreme Court temporarily blocks Arizona execution (Reuters)

Posted: 04 Apr 2011 06:19 PM PDT

PHOENIX (Reuters) – The Supreme Court has granted a stay of execution for a convicted killer in Arizona who was due to die by lethal injection on Tuesday, but the inmate could still be executed this week if the court rejects a petition from his lawyers.

Daniel Wayne Cook, 49, was convicted in 1988 of first degree murder for the killings of Carlos Froyan Cruz-Ramos and Kevin Swaney, together with an accomplice, John Matzke.

He was due to be executed by lethal injection at the state prison in Florence, southeast of Phoenix, at 10 a.m. Tuesday, but the execution was canceled after the U.S. Supreme Court granted a stay on Monday, the Arizona Department of Corrections said in a statement.

The stay came in response to a petition arguing Cook did not have effective legal representation during his trial or appeals process, according to documents filed with the U.S. Supreme Court.

The state's death warrant is valid for 24 hours. If the U.S. Supreme Court rejects the petition, Cook could still be executed on Tuesday, Arizona Supreme Court spokeswoman Jennifer Liewer said.

However, if the execution is not carried out before 10 a.m. on Wednesday, a new date will have to be set, Liewer said.

On July 19, 1987, Cook and Matzke tortured Cruz-Ramos for several hours before crushing his throat with a metal pipe. All three shared an apartment and worked in the same restaurant.

When another co-worker arrived at the apartment, Cook and Matzke strangled him. Matzke pleaded guilty to second-degree murder and testified against Cook.

Cook lost an attempt to block his execution by lethal injection on Friday when a U.S. appeals court ruled authorities could use a controversial drug, sodium thiopental, as part of a lethal cocktail.

Cook's attorneys argued past inmates executed with the drug had their eyes open during their execution, but the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals was not convinced that meant the inmates suffered severe pain.

(Reporting by Tim Gaynor; additional reporting by David Schwartz: Editing by Alex Dobuzinskis)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

Sept. 11 suspects to be tried at Guantanamo Bay (Reuters)

Posted: 04 Apr 2011 03:14 PM PDT

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama yielded to political opposition Monday, agreeing to try the self-professed mastermind of the September 11 attacks in a military tribunal at Guantanamo and not in a civilian court as he had promised.

Attorney General Eric Holder blamed lawmakers for the policy reversal, saying their December decision to block funding for prosecuting the 9/11 suspects in a New York court "tied our hands" and forced the administration to resume military trials.

His announcement was an embarrassing reversal of the administration's decision in November 2009 to try September 11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and four co-conspirators in a court near the site of the World Trade Center attack that killed nearly 3,000 people.

That decision had been welcomed by civil rights groups but strongly opposed by many lawmakers -- especially Republicans -- and New Yorkers, who cheered Holder's announcement that the Obama administration had reversed course.

In moving the case back to the military system, the Justice Department unsealed a nine-count criminal indictment that detailed how Mohammed trained the 9/11 hijackers to use short-bladed knives by killing sheep and camels.

Another of the five -- Walid bin Attash -- tested air security by carrying a pocket knife and wandering close to the doors of aircraft cockpits to check for reactions, said the indictment, which prosecutors asked the court to drop so the case can be handled by a military commission.

PRISON STILL HOLDS 172 PEOPLE

The decision to abandon civilian prosecution was an admission that Obama has not been able to overcome political opposition to his effort to close the prison for terrorism suspects and enemy combatants at Guantanamo Bay in Cuba, a key 2008 campaign promise. It came on the day he kicked off his campaign for re-election in 2012.

James Carafano, a foreign policy expert at the conservative Heritage Foundation think tank, said a military trial for the five men was "the only rational course of action" and Obama was unlikely to be hurt politically by the decision.

"The (U.S.) public basically just ignores the issue these days. Even overseas, Europeans who were so critical before of Guantanamo have really gone to sleep on the issue," he said.

Obama has called the Guantanamo Bay facility, set up by his predecessor President George W. Bush, a recruiting symbol for anti-American groups and said allegations of prisoner mistreatment there had tarnished America's reputation.

He promised to close the prison by the end of his first year in office, but that deadline passed with no action as the administration confronted the hard reality of finding countries willing to accept custody of the inmates.

The prison still holds 172 people, down from 245 when Obama took office in January 2009.

DECISION WELCOMED

The decision to try the five men before military commissions was praised in New York and Washington. New York City Mayor Michael Bloomberg said the cost of holding and securing the trials in Manhattan would have been near "a billion dollars" at a time of tight budgets.

Chuck Schumer, a Democratic senator for New York, called it "the final nail in the coffin of that wrong-headed idea."

Julie Menin, who spearheaded opposition to the trials in New York, said the decision was a "victory for lower Manhattan and my community."

But others, like Valerie Lucznikowska, said the use of military commissions was "just not satisfying to people who want real justice." The 72-year-old New Yorker, whose nephew died in the World Trade Center attack, said the military commissions could be viewed by the world as "kangaroo courts."

Holder said he still believed the 9/11 suspects would best be prosecuted in U.S. civilian courts, despite strong congressional opposition.

Captain John Murphy, the chief prosecutor of the office of military commissions, said his office would swear charges in the near future against the five suspects for their alleged roles in the 2001 attacks.

In addition to Mohammed, an al Qaeda leader captured in Pakistan in 2003, and bin Attash, the accused co-conspirators are Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abdul Aziz Ali and Mustafa Ahmed al Hawsawi.

(Reporting by Phil Stewart, James Vicini, Jeremy Pelofsky, Matt Spetalnick and Susan Cornwell in Washington and Basil Katz in New York; writing by David Alexander; Editing by Sandra Maler and Todd Eastham)



Powered By WizardRSS.com | Full Text Feed | Amazon AffiliateHud Settlement Statement

0 Comments:

Post a Comment