Tuesday, February 15, 2011

Yahoo! News: World News English


Florida's Scott takes businessman's ax to budget (Reuters)

Posted: 14 Feb 2011 10:08 PM PST

MIAMI (Reuters) – Many newly elected Republican governors have pledged to run their states like a business as they grapple with low revenues and multibillion-dollar budget gaps with little relief from a fragile U.S. economic recovery.

But since they took office last month, few have gone as far in advancing campaign promises for less government and lower taxes than Florida's Tea Party-backed Governor Rick Scott.

A political newcomer, with a controversial past as chief executive of a healthcare corporation that paid a record $1.7 billion in fines for defrauding Medicare and other federal programs, Scott has taken to the job of running the fourth-largest U.S. state like a hostile takeover.

An uncompromising conservative, Scott unveiled his first budget last week at a rally attended by about 1,000 Tea Party activists in a Baptist church hall in Eustis, a town some 200 miles outside the state capital Tallahassee, where the state legislature will have to approve his proposed budget.

"Governor Scott said he wanted to present the most conservative budget in the nation," said Alan Stonecipher of the nonprofit Florida Center for Fiscal and Economic Policy.

"It certainly appears to be hugely pro-business which was his stated intention," Stonecipher added. "I would say Florida is right in the mix, or maybe leading the nation, in a movement to, in effect, eviscerate government."

Even by the standards of a state renowned for political scandals and shenanigans, 58-year-old Scott, who has emphasized that he was never charged with any crimes as CEO of the giant Columbia/HCA hospital chain, has raised eyebrows.

His declared intention to cut regulations and taxes, and a 'slash-and-burn' approach to putting Florida's financial house in order with little apparent regard for real-world implications, have prompted warnings of dire consequences.

There may be backlash against Republicans in a presidential battleground state as the new governor, who has never served in elected office before, takes budget-slashing to new heights.

"VOODOO ECONOMICS"

The carefully orchestrated budget presentation cast Scott, who beat his Democratic rival by a single percentage point after spending $73 million of his personal fortune on his own campaign, in the role of a Tea Party man of the people.

But he also ranks among the most unpopular newly elected governors in U.S. history, with a favorability rating of just 28 percent, according to a recent Quinnipiac University poll.

Critics cited his budget proposals -- deep cuts in state spending on education and healthcare to close a deficit of nearly $4 billion, while slashing corporate income and property taxes -- as signaling a disconnect between fiscal conservatives and ordinary Americans reeling from unemployment and the loss of homes and benefits in the recent recession.

"Retreaded voodoo economics," Florida Senate Democratic leader Nan Rich said of Scott's budget plan, referring to the trickle-down economic theory popularized under President Ronald Reagan. "The tentacles of this budget will reach the most vulnerable people in our state," Rich told Reuters.

She said the real trickle-down effect would add to the pain of most Floridians while leaving open many tax loopholes in a state that is home to some of the Republican's richest patrons.

Florida is not alone in contemplating large spending cuts to offset revenues only slowly recovering from recession and the winding down of $150 billion of federal assistance to states from the economic stimulus program of 2009.

According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, nearly all states are considering spending less in fiscal 2012 than in 2008. That was the last year before recession devastated revenues.

The nonpartisan center has warned that reduced spending on education, healthcare and other important services will delay the U.S. recovery and undermine efforts to create jobs, especially in states where new Republican governors like Scott are pushing for corporate tax cuts.

Illinois, where Democratic Governor Pat Quinn successfully pushed a hefty income tax increase to ease a $15 billion budget deficit through the legislature last month, is a rare exception to a national trend toward flat or lower taxes as the best tool to lure investment to recession-hit states.

"IN THE PEOPLE'S HANDS"

Florida is less distressed than Illinois and some other states, where the fiscal crisis has roiled the traditionally stable $2.8 trillion municipal bond market and spurred proposals by some U.S. lawmakers to consider allowing states to declare bankruptcy.

But the Sunshine State is an epicenter for the collapse of the U.S. housing market and the mortgage crisis. It is also has a record 12 percent unemployment rate, the third highest in the country after Nevada and California.

Scott's budget includes a call to cut the state work force by nearly 9,000 jobs and it would require state workers, who have not had a general pay raise in five years, to contribute 5 percent of their salaries to their pensions.

His budget, apart from a vague promise of attracting business investment, appears to hold out little immediate hope for job creation. And he has proposed shifting more of the cost businesses pay for jobless benefits onto Florida taxpayers.

Such controversial proposals have been welcomed by business groups and by his Tea Party supporters.

Tom Gaitens, Florida state director of FreedomWorks, a libertarian group, which works closely with Tea Party activists and is headed by ex- U.S. House of Representatives Republican leader Dick Armey, said he was "very proud" of Scott.

"Even if you don't agree with him, you have to give the guy credit for making hard decisions," Gaitens said. "As a businessman, not as a politician, he understands that the capital that fuels the economy has to be left in the people's hands, not in the government's," he said.

But Scott's initiatives drew sharp criticism elsewhere.

"I'm very disappointed to have these tax cuts put money into well-to-do corporate pockets and abandon the needs of our most fragile and dependent citizens," said Pouria "Paul" Bidhendi, 37, the owner of two businesses, including a job recruiting and staffing company, in Orlando.

"He comes across as this super rich guy talking down to poor people," said John Faherty, 49, an event management consultant. "He's like an alien trying to talk to us."

Gaitens said the Tea Party probably has less than 200,000 active members across the state, but has punched well above its weight. This was reflected in media coverage of personalities like Florida's new U.S. Senator Marco Rubio, a Tea Party-affiliated Cuban-American who is considered a rising star of the Republican Party.

The rank-and-file Tea Partiers' obsession with government spending and deficits also runs counter to recent polls such as a Gallup survey showing that most Americans see joblessness as the country's leading cause of concern by far.

But the Tea Party and its rich supporters are in lockstep with big business in using the fiscal crisis to try to weaken organized labor, analysts say.

"That's the great hope of the far right conservatives. They're seizing the moment of fiscal crisis to either destroy or cripple the labor movement," said Harley Shaiken, a labor expert at the University of California at Berkeley.

(Additional reporting by Barbara Liston in Orlando, Michael Peltier in Eustis, Jeff Mayers in Madison, Wisconsin, and Lisa Lambert in Washington; Editing by Pascal Fletcher and Christopher Wilson)



Powered By WizardRSS

Showtime for House Republican spending cuts (Reuters)

Posted: 14 Feb 2011 10:08 PM PST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – One day after President Barack Obama presented Congress with his $3.7 trillion budget, the focus shifts on Tuesday to Washington's more immediate spending needs and a controversial spending-cut bill that Republicans hope to pass in the House of Representatives.

The House legislation, cobbled together by Republicans after weeks of intraparty fighting, would cut about $61 billion from current spending in a bill to fund government activities through the rest of this fiscal year that ends on September 30.

The spending being proposed would be equal to a 14 percent cut from last year.

The House is expected to hold a freewheeling debate that will see conservatives pushing for even deeper spending cuts -- reflecting the Tea Party presence in the new, Republican-controlled chamber -- while moderates and liberals from both parties worry about the impact of the cuts.

Responding to those concerns, House Majority Whip Eric Cantor on Monday told reporters that the bill would simply pare back spending to 2008 levels.

"I think everybody remembers 2008," Cantor said. "The sun rose and set in 2008... I think right now people understand we don't have the money. You can't keep spending money you don't have."

But Secretary of State Hillary Clinton was concerned enough about the Republican spending plan to travel to Capitol Hill, where she lunched with House Speaker John Boehner.

Following their meeting, Clinton told reporters that while the United States has tough fiscal problems, "The scope of the proposed House cuts is massive. The truth is that cuts of that level will be detrimental to America's national security."

The House Republicans' bill would cut State Department and USAID budgets by some 16 percent this year compared to 2010 at a time when political uncertainty reins in the Mideast following Egyptian President Hosni Mubarak's ouster.

Other government accounts that would face significant reductions under the House bill include popular education programs, USDA meat inspections, NASA space exploration and agriculture research.

Stop-gap funding for this year expires on March 4, giving Congress little time to work out a deal on spending for the rest of the year. As a result, another short stop-gap funding bill is likely while the House, Senate and Obama work out their differences on spending this year.

But with such a deep gap between Democrats and Republicans, there is a chance of failure, which could bring government shutdowns like ones last seen in 1995-96. Those brought immediate halts to many essential government operations and another round could throw financial markets into turmoil.

As the House debates the spending bill for the current fiscal year -- with tough votes on passage anticipated by Thursday or Friday -- the administration will begin defending Obama's budget proposal for fiscal 2012 to skeptical congressional committees.

White House Budget Director Jack Lew and Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner will be grilled by budget and tax-writing committees on Tuesday and continue their appearances through Thursday, along with other Obama Cabinet secretaries.

By April, the Republican-led House Budget Committee is expected to offer its budget blueprint that likely will be vastly different from the one Obama unveiled on Monday.

Still unclear is whether Obama and congressional Republicans will make a serious effort at a long-term fix to the U.S. deficit problem, which is forecast to be in the range of $1.48 trillion to $1.65 trillion just this year, or 9.8 percent to 10.9 percent of U.S. GDP.

Also thrown into the mix in coming weeks will be an attempt to raise U.S. borrowing authority before it is exhausted in April or May. Tea Party activists in the House and Senate are threatening to block that bill.

(Editing by Eric Walsh)



Powered By WizardRSS

Obama budget has $556 billion, six-year transport plan (Reuters)

Posted: 14 Feb 2011 02:00 PM PST

WASHINGTON (Reuters) – President Barack Obama on Monday proposed an ambitious long-term transport spending plan in his 2012 budget as a way to boost U.S. economic competitiveness and spur job growth.

While cutting other spending, Obama aggressively accelerated efforts to upgrade aging roads, bridges and introduce high-speed rail with a six-year, $556 billion package.

"It's really about a big vision, a bold vision, an innovative vision," Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood told reporters.

The total is 60 percent richer than the last transportation blueprint enacted by Congress, which expired in 2009.

Congress is working on its own transportation spending priorities with proposals expected soon. LaHood expressed optimism recently legislation could be approved this year.

In a sign of the intense opposition to Obama's transportation policies, House of Representatives Republicans on Friday proposed eliminating Obama's high-speed passenger rail effort.

Republicans hold the majority in the House and are seeking deep cuts across the board to narrow the budget deficit, which is forecast to reach $1.48 trillion this fiscal year.

The Obama proposal relies heavily on competitive grants and sidesteps earmarks in order to depoliticize how projects are financed. According to LaHood, the plan will consolidate 55 smaller highway programs into five different areas.

"This budget does all that I've talked about in bold terms ... without passing any debt on to future generations," LaHood said, adding the federal government will ensure "the dollars we give out do not exceed dollars coming in."

According to department documents, the proposal's high price would be paid by a "Transportation Trust Fund." Essentially, the administration would expand the current Highway Trust Fund to also back transit, high-speed rail, and a national infrastructure bank. But LaHood said Obama has not suggested where to find revenues for the bigger account.

Obama is not seeking to raise gasoline taxes nor does he embrace calls by some experts to charge motorists a fee for each mile they drive.

INFRASTRUCTURE BANK

Obama's plan includes a $53-billion proposal to advance high-speed rail over six years and a proposal to spend nearly 17 percent of the overall $556 billion transportation package in the first year.

It would also create an infrastructure bank capitalized at $30 billion over six years to finance the biggest projects with the help of states and private investment.

Obama pushed the infrastructure bank idea last year, but it got a cool reception in Congress and a government poll released this summer showed analysts, transportation agencies and states' leaders were unclear about how it would operate.

Under Obama's plan the bank would reside within the Transportation Department and be run by an executive director and a board of officials from federal agencies. At first, it would only finance transportation projects.

General Electric Chief Executive Jeff Immelt said last month that prospects are slim for an infrastructure bank, because of deficit concerns.

Proponents of an infrastructure bank have said investments from private equity and pension funds and other sources would complement federal capital. Projects could generate revenue through tolls or other fees that would provide long-term, low-yield returns for investors.

Australia's Macquarie Group is the global leader in private infrastructure investment, according to Infrastructure Investor magazine rankings. Others include Goldman Sachs and Alinda Capital Partners, the largest U.S. manager of pension funds for infrastructure investment.

The American Society of Civil Engineers estimates it will cost more than $2 trillion to bring roads, bridges, and other infrastructure to a state of good repair.

Increased spending would potentially benefit companies like heavy equipment makers Caterpillar Inc and Deere & Co, sand and gravel producer Vulcan Materials, industrial conglomerate General Electric, engineering firm Parsons Corp, steelmakers and prefabricated materials manufacturers. LaHood is scheduled to visit Caterpillar on Tuesday.

The previous transport bill, a five-year, $285 billion package, expired in September 2009. Since then, Congress has funded road and transit projects through short-term extensions.

(Editing by Anthony Boadle, Tim Dobbyn and Eric Walsh)



Powered By WizardRSS

0 Comments:

Post a Comment